RESUMO
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTO_ST_ABSObjectivesC_ST_ABSPost-acute sequalae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is not well defined in pediatrics given its heterogeneity of presentation and severity in this population. The aim of this study is to use novel methods that rely on data mining approaches rather than clinical experience to detect signals associated with PASC. Materials and MethodsWe used a propensity-matched cohort design comparing children identified using the new PASC ICD10CM diagnosis code (U09.9) (N=1250) to children with (N=6250) and without (N=6250) SARS-CoV-2 infection. We used a tree-based scan statistic to identify potential condition clusters co-occurring more frequently in cases than controls. ResultsWe found significant enrichment among children with PASC in cardiac, respiratory, neurologic, psychological, endocrine, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems, the most significant related to circulatory and respiratory such as dyspnea, difficulty breathing, and fatigue and malaise. DiscussionOur study addresses methodological limitations of prior studies that rely on pre-specified clusters of potential PASC-associated diagnoses driven by clinician experience. Future studies are needed to identify patterns of diagnoses and their associations to derive clinical phenotypes. ConclusionWe identified multiple conditions and body systems associated with pediatric PASC. Because we rely on a data-driven approach, several new or under-reported conditions and symptoms were detected that warrant further investigation.
RESUMO
BackgroundPost-acute sequelae of SARS-Co-V-2 infection (PASC) is associated with worsening diabetes trajectory. It is unknown whether PASC in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) manifests as worsening diabetes trajectory. ObjectiveTo explore the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) and T1D-related healthcare utilization (for diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA] or severe hypoglycemia [SH]) or Hemoglobin (Hb) A1c trajectory. MethodsWe included children <21 years with T1D and [≥]1 HbA1c prior to cohort entry, which was defined as COVID-19 (positive diagnostic test or diagnosis code for COVID-19, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, or PASC) or a randomly selected negative test for those who were negative throughout the study period (Broad Cohort). A subset with [≥]1 HbA1c value from 28-275 days after cohort entry (Narrow Cohort) was included in the trajectory analysis. Propensity score-based matched cohort design followed by weighted Cox regression was used to evaluate the association of COVID-19 with healthcare utilization [≥]28 days after cohort entry. Generalized estimating equation models were used to measure change in HbA1c in the Narrow cohort. ResultsFrom 03/01/2020-06/22/2022, 2,404 and 1,221 youth met entry criteria for the Broad and Narrow cohorts, respectively. The hazard ratio for utilization was (HR 1.45 [95%CI,0.97,2.16]). In the Narrow Cohort, the rate of change (slope) of HbA1c increased 91-180 days after cohort entry for those with COVID-19 (0.138 vs. -0.002, p=0.172). Beyond 180 days, greater declines in HbA1c were observed in the positive cohort (-0.104 vs. 0.008 per month, p=0.024). ConclusionWhile a trend towards worse outcomes following COVID-19 in T1D patients was observed, these findings were not statistically significant. Continued clinical monitoring of youth with T1D following COVID-19 is warranted. Authorship StatementAuthorship has been determined according to ICMJE recommendations DisclaimerThe content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the RECOVER Program, the NIH or other funders. Funding SourceThis research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Agreement OT2HL161847-01 as part of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) program of research.
RESUMO
BackgroundMulti-system inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) represents one of the most severe post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children, and there is a critical need to characterize its disease patterns for improved recognition and management. Our objective was to characterize subphenotypes of MIS-C based on presentation, demographics and laboratory parameters. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of children with MIS-C from March 1, 2020 - April 30, 2022 and cared for in 8 pediatric medical centers that participate in PEDSnet. We included demographics, symptoms, conditions, laboratory values, medications and outcomes (ICU admission, death), and grouped variables into eight categories according to organ system involvement. We used a heterogeneity-adaptive latent class analysis model to identify three clinically-relevant subphenotypes. We further characterized the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of each subphenotype, and evaluated their temporal patterns. FindingsWe identified 1186 children hospitalized with MIS-C. The highest proportion of children (44{middle dot}4%) were aged between 5-11 years, with a male predominance (61.0%), and non- Hispanic white ethnicity (40{middle dot}2%). Most (67{middle dot}8%) children did not have a chronic condition. Class 1 represented children with a severe clinical phenotype, with 72{middle dot}5% admitted to the ICU, higher inflammatory markers, hypotension/shock/dehydration, cardiac involvement, acute kidney injury and respiratory involvement. Class 2 represented a moderate presentation, with 4-6 organ systems involved, and some overlapping features with acute COVID-19. Class 3 represented a mild presentation, with fewer organ systems involved, lower CRP, troponin values and less cardiac involvement. Class 1 initially represented 51{middle dot}1% of children early in the pandemic, which decreased to 33{middle dot}9% from the pre-delta period to the omicron period. InterpretationMIS-C has a spectrum of clinical severity, with degree of laboratory abnormalities rather than the number of organ systems involved providing more useful indicators of severity. The proportion of severe/critical MIS-C decreased over time. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed and preprint articles from December 2019, to July 2022, for studies published in English that investigated the clinical subphenotypes of MIS-C using the terms "multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children" or "pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome" and "phenotypes". Most previous research described the symptoms, clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with MIS-C and how these differ from acute COVID-19, Kawasaki Disease and Toxic Shock Syndrome. One single-center study of 63 patients conducted in 2020 divided patients into Kawasaki and non-Kawasaki disease subphenotypes. Another CDC study evaluated 3 subclasses of MIS-C in 570 children, with one class representing the highest number of organ systems, a second class with predominant respiratory system involvement, and a third class with features overlapping with Kawasaki Disease. However, this study evaluated cases from March to July 2020, during the early phase of the pandemic when misclassification of cases as Kawasaki disease or acute COVID-19 may have occurred. Therefore, it is not known from the existing literature whether the presentation of MIS-C has changed with newer variants such as delta and omicron. Added value of this studyPEDSnet provides one of the largest MIS-C cohorts described so far, providing sufficient power for detailed analyses on MIS-C subphenotypes. Our analyses span the entire length of the pandemic, including the more recent omicron wave, and provide an update on the presentations of MIS-C and its temporal dynamics. We found that children have a spectrum of illness that can be characterized as mild (lower inflammatory markers, fewer organ systems involved), moderate (4-6 organ involvement with clinical overlap with acute COVID-19) and severe (higher inflammatory markers, critically ill, more likely to have cardiac involvement, with hypotension/shock and need for vasopressors). Implications of all the available evidenceThese results provide an update to the subphenotypes of MIS-C including the more recent delta and omicron periods and aid in the understanding of the various presentations of MIS-C. These and other findings provide a useful framework for clinicians in the recognition of MIS-C, identify factors associated with children at risk for increased severity, including the importance of laboratory parameters, for risk stratification, and to facilitate early evaluation, diagnosis and treatment.
RESUMO
Using electronic health record data combined with primary chart review, we identified 7 children across 8 pediatric medical centers with a diagnosis of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) who were managed as outpatients. These findings should prompt a discussion about modifying the case definition to allow for such a possibility.
RESUMO
BackgroundChronic medical conditions are a risk factor for moderate or severe COVID-19 in children, but little is known about post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) in children with chronic medical conditions (CMCs). To understand whether SARS-CoV-2 infection led to potential exacerbation of underlying chronic disease in children, we explored whether children with CMCs had increased healthcare utilization in the post-acute (28 days after infection) period compared to children with CMCs without SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, matched-cohort study using electronic health record data collected from 8 pediatric health care systems participating in the PEDSnet network. We included children <21 years of age with a wide array of chronic conditions, defined by the presence of diagnostic codes, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2022. Cohort entry was defined by presence of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test (polymerase chain reaction or antigen) or diagnostic codes for COVID-19, PASC or MIS-C. A comparison cohort of patients testing negative or without these conditions was matched using a stratified propensity score model and exact matching on age group, race/ethnicity, institution, test location, and month of cohort entry. A negative binomial model was used to examine our primary outcome: composite and setting-specific (inpatient, outpatient, ED) utilization rate ratios between the positive and comparison cohorts. Secondary outcomes included time to first utilization in the post-acute period, and utilization stratified by severity at cohort entry. ResultsWe identified 748,692 patients with at least one chronic condition, 78,744 of whom met inclusion criteria for the COVID-19 cohort. 96% of patients from the positive cohort were matched. Cohorts were well-balanced for chronic condition clusters, total number of conditions, time since first diagnosis, baseline utilization, cohort entry period, age, sex, race/ethnicity and test location. We found that among children with chronic medical conditions, those with COVID-19 had higher healthcare utilization than those with no recorded COVID-19 diagnosis or positive test, with utilization rate ratio of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.18-1.24). The utilization was highest for inpatient care with utilization rate ratio of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.85-2.23) but the utilization was increased across all settings. Hazard ratios estimated in time-to-first-utilization analysis mirrored these results. Patients with severe or moderate acute COVID-19 illness had greater increases in utilization in all settings than those with mild or asymptomatic disease. ConclusionsWe found that care utilization in all settings was increased following COVID-19 in children with chronic medical conditions in the post-acute period, particularly in the inpatient setting. Increased utilization was correlated with more severe COVID-19. Additional research is needed to better understand the reasons for higher care utilization by studying condition-specific outcomes in children with chronic disease.
RESUMO
BackgroundNational data from diverse institutions across the United States are critical for guiding policymakers as well as clinical and public health leaders. This study characterized a large national cohort of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the U.S., compared to patients diagnosed with viral pneumonia and influenza. Methods and FindingsWe captured cross-sectional information from 36 large healthcare systems in 29 U.S. states, participating in PCORnet(R), the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Patients included were those diagnosed with COVID-19, viral pneumonia and influenza in any care setting, starting from January 1, 2020. Using distributed queries executed at each participating institution, we acquired information for patients on care setting (any, ambulatory, inpatient or emergency department, mechanical ventilator), age, sex, race, state, comorbidities (assessed with diagnostic codes), and medications used for treatment of COVID-19 (hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin; corticosteroids, anti-interleukin-6 agents). During this time period, 24,516 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, with 42% in an emergency department or inpatient hospital setting; 79,639 were diagnosed with viral pneumonia (53% inpatient/ED) and 163,984 with influenza (41% inpatient/ED). Among COVID-19 patients, 68% were 20 to <65 years of age, with more of the hospitalized/ED patients in older age ranges (23% 65+ years vs. 12% for COVID-19 patients in the ambulatory setting). Patients with viral pneumonia were of a similar age, and patients with influenza were much younger. Comorbidities were common, especially for patients with COVID-19 and viral pneumonia, with hypertension (32% for COVID-19 and 46% for viral pneumonia), arrhythmias (20% and 35%), and pulmonary disease (19% and 40%) the most common. Hydroxychloroquine was used in treatment for 33% and tocilizumab for 11% of COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilators (25% received azithromycin as well). Conclusion and RelevancePCORnet leverages existing data to capture information on one of the largest U.S. cohorts to date of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to patients diagnosed with viral pneumonia and influenza.
